We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 2050
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Republic Independent Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2051
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the People's Progressive Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the People's Progressive Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the People's Progressive Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Democrat Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Conservative Republic Independent Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the People's Progressive Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Democrat Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Social Democrat Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Social Democrat Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the People's Progressive Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:56:34, May 12, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Republic Independent Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | I figured that this would be a better Coalition. Please support this proposal and vote yes. |
Date | 06:16:44, May 12, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | I will back this. |
Date | 06:21:42, May 12, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | I think you should keep the SDP in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but since this is up for a vote I will approve. I will work closely witrh the SDP to continue their work. |
Date | 11:05:07, May 12, 2005 CET | From | Benevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | If I were the SDP or the PPP, I would refuse to participate in such an absurd coalition. You have nothing in common with the CRIP (if game mechanics were fully implemented, such a cabinet would never be able to getanything done, since the CRIP would constantly disagree with the SDP ad PPP). |
Date | 11:14:43, May 12, 2005 CET | From | Benevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | On another note, I would like to ask the CRIP to PLEASE view his private messages and reply to them. |
Date | 11:23:48, May 12, 2005 CET | From | Social Democrat Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | Thank you PPP. When this is passed I will let you know exactly who I have communicated with and who you need to reply to etcetera. Hopefully this will mean a smooth takeover. |
Date | 16:07:23, May 12, 2005 CET | From | National Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | what happen to use being in the cabinet? |
Date | 18:27:27, May 12, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 2050 |
Message | The CRIP decided not to include you as the cabinet would be passed with only three parties participating. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 93 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 11 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 23 |
Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell |