We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Change
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Conservative party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2160
Description[?]:
We first wishes to say that we have nothing against other religions, we are a accepting party. However our Nation is a nation where there is mandatory to be part of the State Religion, our People are religious, and we wish stability, law and order. And now Religions are free to promote and advertise themselves, Fine, many religions we know, Christiendom, Judaism, etc, we know what they stand for, and so forth. But what about new religions that occur, Scientology, and other ones. Should we allow any nutcase whom make up a nice idea on how the world was created, and what should be done to start a religion and then join his cults ? And take our citizens into this cult ? We say NO. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Current: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Proposed: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:40:10, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | We first wishes to say that we have nothing against other religions, we are a accepting party. However our Nation is a nation where there is mandatory to be part of the State Religion, our People are religious, and we wish stability, law and order. And now Religions are free to promote and advertise themselves, Fine, many religions we know, Christiendom, Judaism, etc, we know what they stand for, and so forth. But what about new religions that occur, Scientology, and other ones. Should we allow any nutcase whom make up a nice idea on how the world was created, and what should be done to start a religion and then join his cults ? And take our citizens into this cult ? We say NO. |
Date | 12:51:18, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | Opposed. |
Date | 13:31:51, December 20, 2005 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | for |
Date | 16:48:39, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | We shall oppose this as well. |
Date | 18:09:44, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | You can't be against something that is by other laws contradicted, then you have to propose to alter those laws. How can you be a state where you have to be member off the STATE religion, and worship that, if you speak of RELIGIONS (PLURAL) are free to promote and advertise themselves against the State religion. THat is just hyppocrazy. |
Date | 18:36:58, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | but what if those religions are christian religions. You know Christianity takes on more than one entity. |
Date | 21:15:46, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | But the laws does not say "Christian Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves." The proposed law says "Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner." . And there we naturally give approval to the Christian religions that follow the word of God, and not those of cult-leaders. |
Date | 01:40:47, December 21, 2005 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | So what do you define as a cult leader? |
Date | 10:33:19, December 21, 2005 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | That is not for me to decide, that is for the future ministry whom would be in charge of this matter if it where to pass. But it is much easier to define a religion, and the basic thing there is that it is a Religion as long as it has some sort of God, and a story of how the world was created, that is one view of what religion is. TO be called a religion has nothing to do with what they practice, a religion can be good, and it can be evil, thing is, with the current laws even the religions whom causes havoc, disorder, death, and evil unto this world is allowed to advertise. |
Date | 15:18:44, December 23, 2005 CET | From | Inactive | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | Scientology is anot a religioon, but a way to make money, a scam. |
Date | 08:10:43, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Religious Change |
Message | SCP, Buddhism is a religion with no god or creation story, just a guide to living and reaching a state of perfection after death. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 112 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay? It's, like, incredible." - Donald Trump |