Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:03:10
Server time: 13:56:49, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): albaniansunited | itsjustgav | JJOXICO | Kubrick2 | LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2158

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2159

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:25:22, December 21, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageStupid new system of the game where all parties in the proposal also must vote yes for the cabinent to pass. Memorare Party: vote yes or we'll have to cut you out of the cabinent to get it to pass.

Date01:04:33, December 21, 2005 CET
FromCapitalism Now! Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageDon't be pushed around by them MP!

Date02:06:19, December 21, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageAye! Don't be pushed around. They gave you crap cabinet positions anyway!

Date03:53:57, December 21, 2005 CET
FromCapitalism Now! Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageThe ICP don't care about you MP. They just see you as a way to get more power, and that is disgusting and unfair.

Date04:02:44, December 21, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageThat is untrue. If we wanted power, we'd want HoG. We just want efficiency in the Alorian government. MP can get Science and Technology if they want. The ICP doesn't care about that position. The point is that if MP keeps voting no, the cabinent won't pass and it would pass quicker without MP in it. It's not that we don't want you in it, it's just that if you vote no and thus don't want to be in it, you won't be in it.

But I can compromise and give you Science and Technology if you want. I would have done it, I was going to when I reproposed the cabinent. If you notice, this is SRP's cabinent proposal - they beat me to proposing it and instead of reflecting the changes of the election I was going to do by giving you Science and Technology (I could care less about a third cabinent spot), they reproposed the old cabinent bill which was when you had a lower seat count.

And remember, I care about you. CNP and ACPA are just trying to get back in power because they *lost* power and are sore losers.

Date04:03:36, December 21, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageNo offense SRP, but you should have given MP my Science and Technology seat - they totally pwned me last election in the parliament.

Date06:09:33, December 21, 2005 CET
FromMemorare Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2158
MessageWe dont accept this poor representation....

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 343

no
   

Total Seats: 257

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "Aristocracy and exclusiveness tend to final overthrow, in language as in politics." - W. D. Whitney

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73