We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the United Countries
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2163
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the United Countries. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the United Countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:51:00, December 21, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the United Countries |
Message | let the debate begin! |
Date | 05:37:20, December 21, 2005 CET | From | BigBoss Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the United Countries |
Message | we support it. |
Date | 05:09:24, December 29, 2005 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the Ratification of the United Countries |
Message | We completely support it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 198 | |||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 228 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn |