Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:59:22
Server time: 03:00:37, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economics Act 3540

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Social Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3541

Description[?]:

An act to free the Baltusian market.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:35:08, September 05, 2013 CET
FromPartido Socialista
ToDebating the Economics Act 3540
MessageMost of these propositions are outrageous and a violation of rights of our nation's workers. The Socialist Party radically opposes them.

Date11:15:05, September 05, 2013 CET
FromNational Social Democrats
ToDebating the Economics Act 3540
MessageRights derive from the nature of man. A man's natural rights are to the defence of his own life and his own justly acquired property. A man has no property in another man's money or land. Thus these propositions are certainly not 'taking away the rights of the workers'. Workers, as a collective, have no rights. Only the individual thinks, reasons and acts and rights can only pertain to individuals. Socialism, it has long been maintained, is impractical, but somehow moral. My party and my government is the only party which will is glad to use logic in the realm of political philosophy and proudly proclaim that socialism is not a valid ethic.

Date20:01:58, September 05, 2013 CET
FromPartido Socialista
ToDebating the Economics Act 3540
MessageLiberal, highly individualistic logic was a failed logic long before socialism came to be. Our party believes that a stronger State is not only the best option for a more humanitary society, but is also more aligned with what the people of Balthusia want.

Date21:05:03, September 05, 2013 CET
FromNational Social Democrats
ToDebating the Economics Act 3540
MessageFascism under any name is still fascism. As for the popularity of what you say, yes, I concede that socialism is popular. Why, I wonder? Well, a government that robs A to pay B, will, unsurprisingly, be supported by B. And socialism is simply robbing the minority of people with low time preferences to give to those with high time preferences, thus leading to a decivilisation of society. But, of course, socialists don't care as long as the poor can become better off through expropriation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 75

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

    Random quote: "The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it." - Adolf Hitler

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 101