We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash
Details
Submitted by[?]: Front for Abolitionism and Socialism
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3544
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty of Dendhârash.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:05:22, September 10, 2013 CET | From | Children of the Wrath | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash |
Message | I don't consent to this RP. |
Date | 14:44:42, September 10, 2013 CET | From | Front for Abolitionism and Socialism | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash |
Message | OOC: Ok, then I won't do it |
Date | 17:33:39, September 10, 2013 CET | From | Children of the Wrath | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash |
Message | OOC: Thanks for not making this harder. |
Date | 19:31:26, September 10, 2013 CET | From | Front for Abolitionism and Socialism | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty of Dendhârash |
Message | OOC: No problem. I was just running with the RP that was done a little on my party's rise to power and a party from Dundorf proposed that as part of an RP. I thought it was interesting but naturally I'm not going to break the rules of common courtesy just for RP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no | Total Seats: 299 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |