Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 01:58:13
Server time: 22:01:46, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Interstellar. | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: State Takeover

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ḥezb-e Aqlmandi ye Manqūlāt

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3547

Description[?]:

The armed forces have decided to perform their duty and have taken over all the organs of state in preparation for the convening of a Majles-e Shorâ (Consultative Council) to determine the direction the nation shall take. The Majles shall sit for eight months and proclaim its decisions in September of this year.

Gen. Peroz Hirini
Chief of State

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 750

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed.

      Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 41