Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 00:23:14
Server time: 19:36:45, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ameerali | burgerboys | LC73DunMHP | Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Workers' Act 3547

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hakla'ut VePituah

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3548

Description[?]:

A bill proposed by the Ministry of Trade and Industry, Ronan Regenbogen

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:41:15, September 17, 2013 CET
FromBrit Yeudish
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageThis is not a Workers' Act; this is an Act for loony Metzist radicals who want to overthrow the norms of civilised society.

Ethan Greenspan MK
Leader of Brit Yeudish

Date00:36:21, September 18, 2013 CET
FromHakla'ut VePituah
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageThis will put economic power in the hands of workers, it is an act for workers and a good one at that.

Ronan Regenbogen MK,
Trade and Industry spokesperson

Date00:38:13, September 18, 2013 CET
FromBrit Yeudish
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageIf this legislation was passed, communist trade union militants would use it to cripple our economy and hold the elected government to ransom. As freedom-loving democrats, this is not something we could tolerate.

Ethan Greenspan MK
Leader of Brit Yeudish

Date00:43:34, September 18, 2013 CET
FromHakla'ut VePituah
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageNormal "freedom-loving democrats" would not want the economy to be run by millionaire businessmen. The current economic situation is undemocratic - my proposals would make our economy more democratic, and more inclusive.

Ronan Regenbogen MK,
Trade and Industry spokesperson

Date15:23:22, September 18, 2013 CET
FromBloc Am Chazak, Am Yedui, Am Libre
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageWe can only support article one. The rest are outrageous.

Date20:01:03, September 18, 2013 CET
FromBrit Yeudish
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageWe are all in favour of making the economy fairer and giving those at the bottom a better deal. What we are not in favour of is a state takeover of all the means of production. HVP claim they are on the side of the ordinary person, but they are not - they are on the side of big government.

Ethan Greenspan MK
Leader of Brit Yeudish

Date21:26:19, September 18, 2013 CET
FromHakla'ut VePituah
ToDebating the Workers' Act 3547
MessageThe state would own some industries, others would be owned by private communities and co-operatives. However, all of them would be run by democratic workers' councils, not the state, so Mr Greenspan's argument is invalid.

Ronan Regenbogen MK,
Trade and Industry spokesperson

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 39

no
 

Total Seats: 46

abstain
 

Total Seats: 35


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68