We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Regarding "Eminent Domain" Policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Market Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3559
Description[?]:
We believe that any individual should not suffer a seizure of his private property,regardless of compensation,for any corporate use. The compensation article though,is fine. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:46:13, October 10, 2013 CET | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the Regarding "Eminent Domain" Policy |
Message | We believe that any individual should not suffer a seizure of his private property,regardless of compensation,for any corporate use.There is enough land for corporations to build and grow. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 230 |
Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard |