We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3563
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:14:55, October 13, 2013 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics |
Message | In order to secure positive relations wwith other members of the Indralan Commonwealth we believe it is neccessary for our country to ratify this treaty! |
Date | 17:52:51, October 13, 2013 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics |
Message | Why should we be apart of the indralan commonwealth? |
Date | 19:58:21, October 13, 2013 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics |
Message | Because it gives us access to everything this (http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2486) talks about. To summarize, it would boost our economy, give us allies if we were ever to enter war, and allow our greatest scientists to combine ideas with those from other countries in order to produce innovative inventions and medical advancements. |
Date | 13:27:41, October 14, 2013 CET | From | Communist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics |
Message | Why should we want to work with them when I seek to oppose |
Date | 16:15:05, October 14, 2013 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Indralan Commonwealth Amendment - Commonwealth Republics |
Message | Why do you seek to oppose them? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 75 | |
no | Total Seats: 275 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "The best politics is right action." - Mahatma Gandhi |