We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Commercial Fishing Regulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3566
Description[?]:
| The fishing should be regulated to proper equilibrate the demand and supply and prevent spicies from extinction |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Current: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Proposed: The fishing industry is nationalised, and the government sets production levels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:35:59, October 23, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Commercial Fishing Regulation Act |
| Message | While we are for quotas, we are not for nationalization of the fishing industry. |
| Date | 23:40:57, October 23, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Commercial Fishing Regulation Act |
| Message | The through nationalisation it is possible to ensure the qouta system, help ecology and long time sustainaility. It is also a step towards big governments which our people prefer. It is also a reverse track on the extreme capitalism that you complained about. I believe, this bill is in our very interest. |
| Date | 04:09:29, October 24, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Commercial Fishing Regulation Act |
| Message | We can not vote yes for it. We do not find privatized fishing to be extreme capitalism in any case, nor do we see seafood of any kind of a necessary resource. We will allow private industry in the production of luxury goods, but not in the production of necessary goods, that we leave for the government. However, we think private business will realize that over fishing will do them more harm than good and see the profits that they stand to lose as a way of maintaining certain quotas. |
| Date | 22:13:51, October 25, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Commercial Fishing Regulation Act |
| Message | We do not believe in setting quotas on the production; do you propose we should start limiting the production of each industry in the country because they are supposedly not sustainable to the ecology?! Please understand that we already do more for the ecology, including marine life and their protection, than we do for any industry's development at any time. And any way, we do not interfere in all spheres of work unnecessarily or too much, so nationalization here, is hugely unpopular and would not be supported! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 400 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
| Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli |