We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Highway Centralization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3567
Description[?]:
| All highways should to be planned by one central body. This reduces too many stakeholders with different interests and ensures efficiency. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy in respect to highways.
Old value:: There is a national highway system constructed and maintained by the national government, and local systems by local governments.
Current: There is a national highway system constructed and maintained by the national government, and local systems by local governments.
Proposed: A national highway infrastructure is constructed and maintained by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:27:46, October 27, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the National Highway Centralization Act |
| Message | We believe that national and local highway systems work best for our people. While the national government looks over the national systems, it provides some relief in that local governments look over local systems, insuring adequate infrastructure, without stretching ourselves too thin. |
| Date | 20:25:34, October 27, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the National Highway Centralization Act |
| Message | National highways and local highways if organized by different bodies will have too much potential conflict of interest and reduce efficiency. There should be central planning office so that these 2 forms highways are properly synchronised. |
| Date | 20:55:34, October 27, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the National Highway Centralization Act |
| Message | Do we not require any local highway/road infrastructure systems? Or is it included in the said proposal? |
| Date | 06:14:00, October 28, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the National Highway Centralization Act |
| Message | it is included in the proposal |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 140 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 260 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle |