We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling
Details
Submitted by[?]: United People's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3568
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:58:33, October 27, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling |
| Message | Stanton, what are you getting at? Care to explain first? |
| Date | 23:19:42, October 27, 2013 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling |
| Message | Stanton is not a way to call my part look at what i have said on my party page about this i will not asking anmore quesne on bill if you do not get my party name right |
| Date | 22:05:30, October 28, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling |
| Message | Like you've cared to answer ever. And if only we could understand what you write, we could call you as you wish; 'Stanton House' or whatever it is that you've tried writing on your party page. And isn't working for some common good here more important than what anyone's called? |
| Date | 22:58:37, October 28, 2013 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling |
| Message | you can call me Stanton House or tory if up do you i voting no on this time because that are some State the eat whale meat |
| Date | 21:37:42, October 29, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the International Treaty for the Regulation of Whaling |
| Message | Okay, Tory! But, commercial whaling is illegal federally already, allowed only for scientific purposes. So how can meat be available? That's why I had put this up, to forge a greater global alliance in this regard. I think it is irresponsible of us if we allow such acts on an endangered species. Do you support this view now? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 260 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 140 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago." - George Porter |