We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Likatonia First, Terra Second
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jegos Frontas
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3575
Description[?]:
Subject. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Current: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Proposed: No foreigners are permitted to reside permanently in this nation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:52:36, November 12, 2013 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Likatonia First, Terra Second |
Message | We see no advantages to any of these proposals. Number one will cripple our expanding tourist industry as written, but we could support something similar if the regulations were further explained. Number two seems that it would place nationality of prospective immigrants above the individual qualifications, which we cannot see the logic to. Number 3 seems a meaningless restriction which would only prompt retaliatory legislation elsewhere against our citizens. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |
no | Total Seats: 225 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |