We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of December 3574
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3576
Description[?]:
The Open-Confederalists and Liberal propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the The Federal Republic of Beluzia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 550,000 BEL | 1,500,000,000 BEL | 1,500,000,000 BEL |
Foreign Affairs | 220,000,000 BEL | 8,000,000,000 BEL | 9,000,000,000 BEL |
Internal Affairs | 1,300,000,000 BEL | 12,000,000,000 BEL | 12,000,000,000 BEL |
Finance | 1,000,000,000 BEL | 7,000,000,000 BEL | 9,000,000,000 BEL |
Defence | 1,070,000,000 BEL | 25,500,000,000 BEL | 20,000,000,000 BEL |
Justice | 9,300,000,000 BEL | 10,000,000,000 BEL | 10,000,000,000 BEL |
Infrastructure and Transport | 10,000,000,000 BEL | 22,500,000,000 BEL | 25,000,000,000 BEL |
Health and Social Services | 42,600,000,000 BEL | 27,000,000,000 BEL | 30,000,000,000 BEL |
Education and Culture | 50,000,000,000 BEL | 27,000,000,000 BEL | 30,000,000,000 BEL |
Science and Technology | 14,000,000,000 BEL | 22,500,000,000 BEL | 22,500,000,000 BEL |
Food and Agriculture | 13,000,000,000 BEL | 11,500,000,000 BEL | 11,500,000,000 BEL |
Environment and Tourism | 1,600,000,000 BEL | 7,500,000,000 BEL | 10,000,000,000 BEL |
Trade and Industry | 8,500,000,000 BEL | 13,000,000,000 BEL | 14,000,000,000 BEL |
Total | 152,590,550,000 BEL | 195,000,000,000 BEL | 204,500,000,000 BEL |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:16:40, November 11, 2013 CET |
From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | If both these bills get accepted. This would mean that first of. Our revenue will be lowered by roughly 2 percent. And that our expenses will raise with 9500000000. Before we had moderate taxes with a surplus of 4.88 percent which is too high. With these proposals we will have a medium surplus of 2.58 percent. Some may think this isn't enough but this is only a start
ooc: Im using the spreadsheet calculator for particracy and with our previous budget it says we had too much of a surplus |
Date | 12:23:18, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | Beluzian Security forces work day and night to ensure the safety and sovergeinty of our beloved country. They put their lives in risk daily to protect us from enemies both foreign and domestic.Any cut will just compromise our defence significantly therefore RDNP wont accept any cuts in defence.
Instead we would propose a necessary bump in defence spending : 30,000,000,000 BEL at least |
Date | 18:13:37, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | Our spending is already unnecesaraly large. We need to see this in proportion. What you guys are proposing is that military becomes the greatest spender., and for what? To defend our lands. Its not like we are fighting a war.
Ooc:im using the financial spreadsheet provided and it shows our current military spending as very high |
Date | 18:32:21, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | While a 2000000000 BEL increase in Finance is rather unnecessary, upto 1.5 would have done...we do not appreciate the cut in defence spending so drastically. We've always maintained 'defence' as our second biggest spend, and would like to keep it so.
|
Date | 18:35:53, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | interesting proposal. As most of you seem to disagree with the cuts to military i will keep it as it is and to maintain our healthy surplus I will cut back funding of finance back to its original state and lower the proposed spending of environment and tourism |
Date | 18:43:08, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | We do not have any issues with the increase in environment and tourism at all, could be good for us too! And even finance is not a concern, just a suggestion, since the Finance ministry is a bureaucratic one mostly and allots funds to the relevant ministries/departments through budget proposals like these, so it may not require much funding increase of its own at the moment.
As Finance Minister, it is your prerogative entirely, to make decisions you feel are best! |
Date | 18:45:14, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | We do not have any issues with the increase in environment and tourism at all, could be good for us too! And even finance is not a concern, just a suggestion, since the Finance ministry is a bureaucratic one mostly and allots funds to the relevant ministries/departments through budget proposals like these, so it may not require much funding increase of its own at the moment.
As Finance Minister, it is your prerogative entirely, to make decisions you feel are best! |
Date | 18:45:42, November 12, 2013 CET |
From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | We do not have any issues with the increase in environment and tourism at all, could be good for us too! And even finance is not a concern, just a suggestion, since the Finance ministry is a bureaucratic one mostly and allots funds to the relevant ministries/departments through budget proposals like these, so it may not require much funding increase of its own at the moment.
As Finance Minister, it is your prerogative entirely, to make decisions you feel are best! |
Date | 03:50:35, November 13, 2013 CET |
From | Beluzian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of December 3574 | Message | While we applaud a reduction in defense spending we would feel the size of government is too large to begin with, rather than distributing the savings from defense to the other ministries, we should return that largess to the Beluzian people. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 0 |
no | Total Seats: 283 |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family." - Saul Alinsky |