We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Industry support Act.(Without cutting taxes)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3576
Description[?]:
| Through this we do no longer have to cut taxes for corporations, although it does have some side effects, it is a short term boost for out economy and it is reversable anytime |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: The government promotes forest clearance.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: Industrial pollution is not regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:03:08, November 14, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the The Industry support Act.(Without cutting taxes) |
| Message | I can see no merit in this proposal. If this goes through, it means we let unlimited and unchecked logging and all other activities that will destroy our nature that is already so fragile. Nothing that we do must be, beyond a limit, at the sake of the nature we live in. How can we promote such an unsustainable lifestyle which will have only detrimental impacts always, even in the long run, irrespective of how short-lived this proposal could be? |
| Date | 18:13:55, November 14, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the The Industry support Act.(Without cutting taxes) |
| Message | This is short term boost for industries. Besides, if we deforest now, we can also reforest soon and reshape the eco system which can be controlable profitable and to our liking. |
| Date | 18:36:42, November 14, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the The Industry support Act.(Without cutting taxes) |
| Message | Why wait until years of reforestation when we do not even need to deforest. Our forests are rich now, and so are our logging contractors, public or private. This comes at a very wrong time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 113 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 170 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "I reject the cynical view that politics is a dirty business." - Richard M. Nixon |