We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3579
Description[?]:
OOC: The issue could be referred to the Supreme Court, rules below: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=292015 However note that Justices serve 21 years terms Justices are appointed, in a staggered manor by the Head of State and approved by the House The Liberals controlled both of these from 3546 - 3573 - 28 years Therefore on the Liberals leaving office in 3573, every one of the Justices on the Court would have been Liberal appointed and therefore sympathetic to our cause. Since terms are staggered - the RS Doge would have been able to appoint 1, maybe 2 all the most. So the current court make up would be a 5 / 2 Liberal majority at least. Like I say we can take this rp to the court or come up with an alternative ending |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:53:40, November 19, 2013 CET | From | Gilde Mercantile Solentia | To | Debating the OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute |
Message | OOC: Sorry I got to long. I've been busy with relief efforts since the typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda hit my country. Now, I am back and yes you could let the Supreme Court take it. All the courts aside from the Supreme Court is Guild-controlled, duh...this why I chose Pinara to be capital, Shinatawa and its cities are hard core Guild members. |
Date | 23:40:38, November 19, 2013 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute |
Message | OOC http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=126&p=68123#p68123 Not sure I agree with the comment about all the courts aside from the Supreme Court being Guild-controlled. What would the basis of this be |
Date | 00:08:09, November 20, 2013 CET | From | Grand Liberal Party | To | Debating the OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute |
Message | Vote to archive |
Date | 02:28:35, November 20, 2013 CET | From | Gilde Mercantile Solentia | To | Debating the OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute |
Message | Shinatawa, Orame and Tesuhen courts could be very biased for me while Fuwan is yours and Nukeya= neutral? |
Date | 03:49:51, November 20, 2013 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the OOC: Resolving the Clark, Greenmir, and Grainger Legal Dispute |
Message | OOC: You guys should have probably set up the Supreme Court the way Lodamun did. We have a set way of calculating ours, and which players control how many judges. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 750 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "Every month we do not have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs." - Nancy Pelosi |