We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judicial Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3581
Description[?]:
| This call for major changes in the national legal system |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the use of forensic DNA databases.
Old value:: Only DNA from persons convicted of crime is recorded.
Current: Only DNA from persons convicted of crime is recorded.
Proposed: All citizens' DNA is recorded.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the organization of police/law enforcement
Old value:: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Current: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Proposed: There is a national police department, funded by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:02:00, November 23, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Judicial Reform Bill |
| Message | We can not advocate for Article 2 which would be a complete intrusion on the privacy of all citizens everywhere. |
| Date | 14:48:47, November 23, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Judicial Reform Bill |
| Message | Though your intentions on this cannot be questioned, we cannot assert enough of the fact that this would mean increased power to the federal government by actually taking away the local government's powers in their affairs. We should gradually be going the federal way in some years, not the unitarist way. |
| Date | 20:21:51, November 23, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Judicial Reform Bill |
| Message | We cannot accept the consolidation of these powers into the central government. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 60 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 340 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |