We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical New Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2161
Description[?]:
| The is NO reason the government should be able to take someone's house, business, or any other plot or acre of land under private control. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Current: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:12:27, December 24, 2005 CET | From |  Red Eye Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain |
| Message | We believe this policy is better than before. |
| Date | 18:37:52, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain |
| Message | Excellent policy. |
| Date | 21:19:10, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Radical New Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain |
| Message | Glad to have your support on this vital issue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 161 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 246 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |