Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 02:59:53
Server time: 13:00:06, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2164

Description[?]:

Whereas; The Luthori government is supposed to be a representative democracy; and

Whereas; Long intervals between elections creates a disconnect between the people and their representatives; and

Whereas; Such a disconnect fosters an overbearing and paternalistic government; it is

Resolved; Luthori should hold elections every three years.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:36:39, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageThe people have a right to be heard. Too often they are ignored because it is known that the next election doesn't come for many years. NPH wants to return the government to the people.

Date11:37:30, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageThis should be interesting. Make it three years and you have my votes.

Date11:40:43, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageDone and done.

Date11:42:01, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageYou have my votes.

Date11:43:14, December 24, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageMake it five years and you stand a chance. Elections cause great disruption to the legislative agenda.

Date11:45:37, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageWell, 5 years is simply too long, there is not so much pending legislation (prior to my introduction of bills) that throwing a bill back into debate after some votes had been cast would be burdensome. And I believe the government should take on such a burden if the result is to return the government to the people.

Date12:00:58, December 24, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageWe believe the constant burden of campaigning and vote buying is a barrier to sound governance and leads to short-termism and instability.

Date12:06:53, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageThe DUP's position is laughable. HA.

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=38121

How about when you were trying to further entrench yourself in the majority by calling for early elections? Was that a burden? Was that a barrier to sound governance?

Date12:19:39, December 24, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageCalling for elections at appropriate times is far better than having them forced on us during times of stable government. It takes more than three years to elect an emperor and cabinet, forge alliances, draft treaties and ratify them. Democracy is something we should pay lip service to, not become the slaves of.

Date12:33:07, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageThere is a difference between what you are accusing the DUP of doing and making sure all Luthorians are represented. The UCP represented the extreme right-wing of their party coalition, so it didn't entrench their position to hold early elections.

Our political system is different to the system you are used to in America, so I think an analogy is in order. In our system, there are 6-8 parties, but they represent three sides of politics.

The Luthori Progressive Alliance is akin to the democrats and is compromised of the Rzeczpospolita Party (left-leaning centrists), the Seosavists Republican Party (far left-wing) and the Luthori Green Party (moderate left-wing).

The Luthori Christian Coalition is akin to the republicans and is compromised of the Catholic Peoples Party (right-leaning centrists), the Democratic Unionist Party (moderate right-wing) and the Rednecks Party (far right-wing).

Then there is the independent parties.

Date12:50:04, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageI am American, but do have a political science degree that in part focused on comparative politics so I do understand how a unicameral system led by a PM works. I do appreaciate you telling me where the different parties lay on the political spectrum, although I would disagree w/ your characterization of the parties based upon some of my observations. I would say that the American system of governement provides its citizens w/ a false dychotomy and that attempted to lay out political parties along a left right scale presents a similar dychotomy.

As for entrenching their position, I quote "Why vote against a chance to increase our majority?" His reasoning for the election was to increase the majority (i.e. entrench their position). He wanted the election in order to further increase the strength of the coalition government.

Clearly his justification for opposing shorter election periods is not because it takes so long to set up the government (that election was held less than 2 years after the previous), but because he hopes to have elections only when they favor his party.

Date12:57:47, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageThe departed party was part of his party coalition, so most of their seats would of gone to his party and that of the Rednecks, independent of when the elections are held. If they hadn't called for new elections, the government would of likely been stalled for four years.

Date13:00:47, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageNot really, because his statement indicates it wasn't a matter of getting a majority, but rather increasing the majority. The intent was clearly to hold elections at a time that was politically convenient.

Date13:01:59, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageWell I didn't mind, I think every party picked up seats that election.

Date13:11:00, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageBut we should be less concerned w/ the outcome and more concerned with the principles behind the decision. That is why it is hard for me to understand why you have entered a coalition government where the leader of that government puts forward positions that are anathema to your supporters.

Date13:13:09, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageBecause neither party coalition can gain enough support to do it on their own.

Date13:18:45, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageWhy wouldn't a coalition of the left that brought in the Catholic Peoples Party w/ you at the head be effective?

Date13:22:02, December 24, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageWe also called for elections when the SRP returned. Holding elections by popular consent has many advantages over holding them ALL THE TIME, not least in terms of turnout.

Date13:29:59, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageBut if elections were held regularly it would be less difficult to form a government because we would see fewer wholesale changes in representation in the election results. Longer periods of time would likely result in bigger swings, meaning that it is harder to form a government.

Date13:31:36, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageNot really, we haven't had any dramatic swings for decades.

Date13:35:49, December 24, 2005 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageSo what is the difficulty in forming a government and having regular elections?

Date15:23:31, December 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageI like it the way we have.

Date00:54:58, December 25, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageSince it takes a long time to build up visibility regular elections can dishearten new parties, leading to a high turnover.

Date20:48:40, December 29, 2005 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the NPH Believes the People Should Be Heard
MessageI'll vote yes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 215

no
   

Total Seats: 394

abstain
 

Total Seats: 141


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. " - Thomas Paine

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82