Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 03:56:42
Server time: 12:03:17, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2160

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2161

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:19:03, December 24, 2005 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageA proposal for efficent government that includes the minimum amount of parties that can effectively govern! (i.e. can carry a majority).

Date15:21:08, December 24, 2005 CET
From Democratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageWe can agree to this.

Date16:18:58, December 24, 2005 CET
From Peoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageI see no problem with it.

Date01:15:41, December 25, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageTraitor and hypocrite.

Date02:20:27, December 25, 2005 CET
From Peoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageI dont care what your party thinks...your party is a joke, you dont care about the people so much as you do about going aganist the Libertarian Party wiether there right or wrong. We however see that they are not totally corrupt...as you see them. They are a bit different then us and we accept that, however you can account to you power loss because of you inablility to make some compramises.

Date09:59:37, December 25, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageYou deny your hypocrisy? I thought not... You are merely interested in power, and not the people.

And you might like to note that we DO agree with the Libertarian Party on occasions. It has nothing to do with them. It is strange that you work so closely with an extreme right-wing party, ignoring your supposed left-wing allies. We guess that you are only left-wing as far as you get votes.

Date21:15:48, December 25, 2005 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageIf the SPH are so against this cabinet why did they not vote against it?

Date23:52:04, December 25, 2005 CET
From Peoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageAt least i can consider them more realistic then a supposed fellow Leftist party such as yourself SPH. And i do deny it because i am a left wing party till the day that this party ends. The people come first and not power. I accepted this because you refussed to compramise on some key issues. We are greatful for your support on other issues...and we give credit where credit is due...but we dont give it where it is not due.

You are the corrupt party in the left wing party and we will watch as you lose your power.

Date02:36:29, December 26, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageBecause it was proposed and brought to vote within a month, and so we had not time to vote for it befopre it passed another month later.


WE are corrupt? Hardly. You are the one sleeping with the right-wing and ignoring the left-wing. And the Socialist Party has been around for well over a century... we will get back into power soon enough.

Date18:12:06, December 26, 2005 CET
From Peoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2160
MessageCall it what you want...but at times they have some ery valid points...however not to many. And maybe you will, but so long as you do not take up a more Socialist stance on certain issues...i dont see it happening anytime soon.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 167

no
 

Total Seats: 62

abstain
    

Total Seats: 64


Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

Random quote: "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61