We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Allied Arms Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Peoples Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2165
Description[?]:
| Trade between allied nations of arms. Only allies will be able to recieve arms that we as the nation of Hutori makes. This is a good way to keep track of are weapon deals. If a Hutorian weapon is used in a killing or in a terrorist deal, we can see who it was that sold it to them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Proposed: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:30:08, December 25, 2005 CET | From |  Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | We already can do such, because we have to approve each and every arms sale to another nation, meaning we have serial numbers exactly on every single Hutorian weapon that leaves the Democratic Republic. |
| Date | 18:50:21, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | Yes but this will make sure that only those that are allied with us gets them. |
| Date | 21:13:56, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | War is by necessity a machiavellian activity. In war it may be advantageous to sell arms to those who are not, at that time, our allies. Therefore to outlaw such sales is too restrictive. Against. |
| Date | 23:46:53, December 25, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | But to allow open sales to all nations may prove to be fatal, exspecially if are own weapons are used against us. |
| Date | 21:10:45, December 26, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | But with the law as it stands the government has the final say in all arms sales. Therefore the government makes the final call as to whether it is too risky or not. |
| Date | 05:02:10, December 27, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | True...but the safty can still be compramised, it not so bothersome if we just sell them to are allies. |
| Date | 21:08:18, January 01, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Allied Arms Bill |
| Message | The word allies would lost all the meaning if we sold weapons to the enemy's of our allies, so i guess this bill makes sense, by the other way i understand the position of the Libertarian Party, but i donīt agree that the decision should be from the government, the decision should be from the parliement. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 154 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 139 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
| Random quote: "Radical left-wing ideologies must be stamped out." - Franklin McCarthy, former Solentian politician |