Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:14:37
Server time: 20:45:22, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): Arusu-Weareback | friedrich3 | Liu Che | SE33 | SocDemDundorfian | starfruit | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the International Gay Rights treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberty and Prosperity Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2161

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the International Gay Rights treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:09:35, December 24, 2005 CET
FromLiberty and Prosperity Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Gay Rights treaty
MessageI will propose this every session until it passes.

Date22:23:09, December 24, 2005 CET
FromAlianse Progresivitāte
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Gay Rights treaty
MessageI will vote no every session until it passes.... erm... huh, I guess that's not a huge threat now is it? ;-)

Date02:21:02, December 25, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Gay Rights treaty
MessageYou should rename this the "Brokeback mountain" Act

lol..


I am not against gay rights, I am just against our restricting ourselves in such a manner...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 332

no
   

Total Seats: 312

abstain
 

Total Seats: 106


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49