Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 00:31:15
Server time: 15:28:44, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Interstellar. | Lab47AU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Provision for Wider Representation and Servitude Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Allied Humanists

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3610

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:00:08, January 22, 2014 CET
FromPeople's Reform Movement
ToDebating the Provision for Wider Representation and Servitude Act
MessageWhy?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
      

    Total Seats: 599

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "How many legs does a dog have if you call its tail a leg? Four. Calling a dog's tail a leg does not make it a leg." - Abraham Lincoln

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 41