Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:53:12
Server time: 06:06:47, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Investmentgesetz 3622

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationales Bürgerforum (NBF)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3622

Description[?]:

An Act to prohibit majority foreign ownership of certain classes of Hulstrian and Gao-Soton companies

Herr Präsident, Hulstrian and Gao-Soton businesses must remain Hulstrian and Gao-Soton. As much as we believe that the market is a force for creating prosperity, we cannot accept the risk that the intentions of foreign shareholders in our companies may be far from benign. We must realise that there are situations when the government must fulfil its responsibility to safeguard the economic security of our nation, and this is one such occasion.

Edith Strötzel MdR
NBF Caucus Leader

Addendum:
1) The prohibition on majority foreign ownership of Hulstrian and Gao-Soton companies shall apply only to publicly traded companies.
2) Companies subject to the present Act may apply to the Minister of Trade and Industry for an exemption from the provisions of the present Act if they are unable to, or have adequate reason to be unwilling to, raise funds from domestic sources, and their inability or unwillingness to do so may result in severe financial or other hardship for the company in question.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:55:25, February 14, 2014 CET
From Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund
ToDebating the Investmentgesetz 3622
MessageHerr Präsident,

There are sufficient protections in the realm of the market and the costs are too high to even consider the policy proposed by Frau Strötzel. Our companies protect themselves through preferential shares constructions and other defence mechanisms. They do not need the government to do it for them. In fact, our economy does not need the government to do it for them - au contraire, foreign investment allows our economy to keep growing, innovating and developing at the full potential that slumbers in it, and it would be unwise to restrict that.

shr. ehrw. Liduine Peters, MdR (HDV - St. Anton und Budental)
Finanzministerin

Date23:25:08, February 14, 2014 CET
From Nationales Bürgerforum (NBF)
ToDebating the Investmentgesetz 3622
MessageHerr Präsident, we recognise the value of foreign investment, but it is a matter of national economic security for this government to prevent excessive foreign influence in our economy. We do not feel that these measures are excessively onerous, and allowing private companies to be exempt and allowing public companies to apply for waivers with reasonable cause are sufficient to address any drawbacks a policy like this might otherwise result in.

Edith Strötzel MdR
NBF Caucus Leader


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 147

no
   

Total Seats: 496

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

Random quote: "Under every stone lurks a politician." Aristophanes (450 BC - 388 BC), Thesmophoriazusae, 410 B.C

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48