Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 01:04:01
Server time: 18:55:58, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Aren | jamescfm-sol | Moderation | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Water Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2163

Description[?]:

A bill to regulate the quality of drinking water.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:42:17, December 27, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Water Act
MessageAlternatives:
*The government does not regulate the quality of drinking water.
*Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
*The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
*The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)

Thoughts? I would be in favour of either of the latter two but possibly the above moreso.

Date13:47:49, December 27, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Water Act
MessageSingle standard would probably be simpler to implement, although the last one might be easier on energy requirements. We would be happy with either one.

Date17:42:03, December 28, 2005 CET
FromRevolutionary Socialist Alliance
ToDebating the Water Act
MessageSingle standard is best for all ,less beurocracy as well we think.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 237

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 124


    Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

    Random quote: "He comes out of hibernation once every three years and says something stupid. No wonder the UR fell apart." - Tirza Sommer, Pragmatic Party Leader, on the Dorvish President, Leonhard Khan.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54