We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Zivilgesellschaftliche Kultur, 3635
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberale Volkspartei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3636
Description[?]:
| Herr Präsident, involvement in efforts aimed at protecting and preserving national heritage should not be monopolized by the government. This reform will make sure that civil society and local communities regain control over these issues. Erik Fuchswalder, MdR LVP-Kuratha Klubobmann der Liberalen |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: The state encourages and funds private efforts towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:36:48, March 13, 2014 CET | From |  Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund | To | Debating the Zivilgesellschaftliche Kultur, 3635 |
| Message | Gicho-sama, Culture is not a private property, but something that belongs to all of us and ultimately to our children. Although we would welcome more private efforts to preserve cultural and historic heritage, and the policy of Herr Egli while in office has always been such, we think it is vital that the national government remains a partner in this, although on an equal basis. If civil society does not make the choice despite all our encouragements, it would be morally wrong for us to let such important heritage be lost. Mariko Kasaya MdR (HDV - Hilgar) |
| Date | 20:42:20, March 13, 2014 CET | From | Solidarität | To | Debating the Zivilgesellschaftliche Kultur, 3635 |
| Message | Herr Präsident, I echo the comments made by Mariko Kasaya. There is an overwhelming public interest in protecting our heritage, and that means the government has to be prepared to get involved when necessary. Hertha Kolbe MdR Minister of Health & Social Services Chairwoman of Solidarity |
| Date | 21:49:48, March 13, 2014 CET | From | Liberale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Zivilgesellschaftliche Kultur, 3635 |
| Message | Herr Präsident, who, if not civil society, should have the final say over what constitutes the concept of "public interest"? Certainly not politicians, at least not if we don't wish to confirm the allegations of elitism that have been made against our parties regularly in recent years. Erik Fuchswalder, MdR LVP-Kuratha Klubobmann der Liberalen |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 379 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 221 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page. |
| Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |