We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638
Details
Submitted by[?]: Great National Republican Guard
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3638
Description[?]:
| This bill serves to remove the parliamentary privilege of the Allied Humanists to allow them to face charges for: - Public Blasphemy - Conspiracy to commit Private Blasphemy - Treason If the President wishes to press charges, by law he is allowed to sentence the offenders to death once religion is involved. -- The government parties had set up a separate legislature with the current composition: - NRG: 169 seats - SAP: 141 seats - P&A: 92 seats The NLA, an opposition party, was allowed to have 1 seat out of benevolvence. These parties already had a majority: http://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?after=19620&before=19632&nation=19 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:51:46, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | The president would like to consult the Supreme Court, or at least the part of it that isn't subject to suspicion. The members of the Supreme Court would have to ask themselves the following questions: - Is AH guilty of public blasphemy? - Has AH committed treason toward the nation and its official religion? - If yes is answered on one of the two previous questions: Who is to blame? Paul Spaak President of Lodamun |
| Date | 15:08:39, March 17, 2014 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, All Nationalists in the Supreme Court believe that "Yes" is the answer to the first 2 questions, and that the entire party is to be blamed. -- Chandler Huddleson, NRG Spokesman on Justice |
| Date | 16:12:38, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, So do the Progressives. All of AH is to blame for acts of treason and blasphemy. Henry Rolin Justice delegate for P&A |
| Date | 16:17:19, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, since the majority of the Supreme Court find the Allied Humanists, and all of its members, guilty; and since the Presidium has a majority acknowledging the decision of the Supreme Court; the president doesn't see any other sentence than death penalty for all of the members of Allied Humanists. Paul Spaak President of Lodamun |
| Date | 16:23:09, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We haven't heard from the SAP yet. This is the Supreme Court's composition: Humanists: 28 Nationalists: 22 Anarchists: 13 Progressives: 12 Layout: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2709/13129671254_61bc9103a2_b.jpg Even without the Supreme Court, however, you can still sentence them to death. -- Chandler Huddleson, NRG Spokesman on Justice |
| Date | 18:16:26, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Revocation of Allied Humanists' Immunity - 3638 |
| Message | Mister Huddleson, thank you for pointing that out. I asked to consult the Supreme Court on this, and since most of the members found AH guilty (I neglect AH's seats in the board), I feel confident that these people are indeed guilty. Therefore I have decided, through our religious doctrine, that these people shall be sentenced to death. The faster we get over with it, the better for our nation. Paul Spaak |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 403 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |