Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 02:29:39
Server time: 17:30:20, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | burgerboys | Mbites2 | Nileowen_Kir | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Call for early elections, February 3642

Details

Submitted by[?]: Stanton House

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: October 3642

Description[?]:

We, the Stanton House, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:19:56, March 27, 2014 CET
FromStanton House
ToDebating the Call for early elections, February 3642
Messagewe need a elections as they is only 438 of the 750 seats take by the party the are in the games

Date02:52:58, March 27, 2014 CET
FromBeluzian Syndicalist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, February 3642
MessageWe recognise the argument made, though we have dismissed it in the past. That a number of parties have abandoned their constituents is unfortunate, yet it remains the faut of those parties alone. That said we respect the views of our coalition partner.

We will enter discussions with our other coaliton partner - the New Beluzian Movement - to determine our course of action here.

We would note that there are currently a lot of bills being debated and voted upon, some of which date back to the previous Assembly. Should an early election be called those bills would be delayed yet again. In the interests of legislative efficiency we would at least argue for delaying any new elections until after the current voting stage bills have been voted upon.

Date08:42:43, March 27, 2014 CET
FromNew Beluzian Movement
ToDebating the Call for early elections, February 3642
MessageWe've roughly agreed that new elections, while not ideal, are for the best. However, as a caveat, we would like to be able to submit all previously proposed bills as soon as feasibly possible for a vote, as we have essentially not managed to pass any legislation, and this frustrates our movement.

Date13:16:24, March 27, 2014 CET
FromBeluzian Syndicalist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, February 3642
MessageThe fact that you have been unable to pass any legislation - and are now far less able to do so - is entirely you own fault.

The first stable legislating government that Beluzia has seen in many long years has been case out, and all for the short term electoral advantage of our coalitiion partners.

Shame on both of you.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 344

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 134


    Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra.

    Random quote: "Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." - John Maynard Keynes

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 50