We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice/Military Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Feministas Verdes
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3644
Description[?]:
| The proposals in this bill aim to rectify a number of preposterous decisions made by the previous administration. They broadly all fall under the category of justice and military reform. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: No curfew policies may be established.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning diplomatic immunity.
Old value:: The Government grants full diplomatic immunity and foreign diplomats are protected from arrests and prosecution from all laws and are protected from civil lawsuits, but may be expelled.
Current: The government grants no diplomatic immunity and foreign diplomats are subject to arrest and prosecution and civil action under all laws of the host nation.
Proposed: Diplomats are exempt from prosecution for criminal acts but not from civil lawsuits, but may still be expelled because of criminal acts.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Legality of multiple citizenship.
Old value:: Multiple citizenship is allowed without further regulations.
Current: Multiple citizenship is allowed, but must be registered.
Proposed: Multiple citizenship is allowed, but must be registered.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are not officially acknowledged but are allowed to exist.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed but are heavily regulated by the government.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:35:20, March 30, 2014 CET | From | Autonomous Commons Party | To | Debating the Justice/Military Reform |
| Message | We are unable to vote in favour of this bill as presented. We would support it if it did not propose changes to Curfew Policy. |
| Date | 19:45:09, March 30, 2014 CET | From | Feministas Verdes | To | Debating the Justice/Military Reform |
| Message | We believe that in the current turbulent international climate, it would be prudent to reserve the option to impose curfew, only if the circumstance was dire enough to require it. We would be happy to draft a set of regulations to be followed when considering the implementation of a curfew with any party who wishes to be involved in such discussions. |
| Date | 20:16:19, March 30, 2014 CET | From | Autonomous Commons Party | To | Debating the Justice/Military Reform |
| Message | Given the openness of your invitation, we confirm that we want to vote in favour of this bill. However, we wish to remind you that a true commitment to openness is consonant with its maximisation. As such, we expect parties to maximise their efforts to crowdsource these regulations, rather than draw them up behind our people's backs. Parties' confirmation that they will act in accordance to our suggestions will be of great comfort to us in the process of finalising our decision. |
| Date | 20:17:06, March 30, 2014 CET | From | Autonomous Commons Party | To | Debating the Justice/Military Reform |
| Message | Given the openness of your invitation, we confirm that we want to vote in favour of this bill. However, we wish to remind you that a true commitment to openness is consonant with its maximisation. As such, we expect parties to maximise their efforts to crowdsource these regulations, rather than draw them up behind our people's backs. Parties' confirmation that they will act in accordance to our suggestions will be of great comfort to us in the process of finalising our decision. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 516 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 234 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
| Random quote: "A dictatorship is a country where they have taken the politics out of politics." - Sam Himmell |