We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-enforcing the Central Governement
Details
Submitted by[?]: CIVIL UNION
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2163
Description[?]:
| Federalism has gone mad in our Country. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may set curfews, but national government does not.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: Minors may not use streets or public property beyond the curfew time.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: Health and safety laws are to be determined by local governments.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:27:34, December 28, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Re-enforcing the Central Governement |
| Message | What federalism? I am the only one with MODERATE federalist policies, and my rating is still "unitarist leaning" Regardless, Article 1 is acceptable to me, but still doomed to fail in this liberal country. Article 2 is good as is, and changing that legislation would be detrimental. So NO |
| Date | 11:47:56, December 28, 2005 CET | From | Socio-Democratic Union | To | Debating the Re-enforcing the Central Governement |
| Message | I'd have supported article 2 if it was alone, but I'm against article 1. So I'll go against this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 270 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 480 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." - Ayn Rand |