Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:52:49
Server time: 15:07:10, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Arusu-Weareback | HopesFor | Interstellar. | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2164

Description[?]:

We propose that tap water would be deemed drinkable when it meets certain standards such that the amount of pollutants or other substances is lower than a certain proportion in relation to the amount of water.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:46:04, December 28, 2005 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageWe do not think this good policy. Only tap water that intended to be drinkable should mandated as such, certainly not a blanket solution like this.

Date11:50:30, December 28, 2005 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageWe do not think this good policy. Only tap water that intended to be drinkable should mandated as such, certainly not a blanket solution like this.

Date16:23:58, December 28, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageThe AAS supports this much-needed regulation of the water industry.

Date13:48:15, December 30, 2005 CET
FromLikaton Fascist Front
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageWe fear that irrigation water for use on Private farm, will fall foul of this legislation and be forced to be made drinbkable, at huge cost to the individual. Also, tap outlets in areas that are occasionally used for water supply to fight fires etc may need to be removed as they could not possibly be made to comply with these regulations.

Date15:10:45, December 30, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageThe AAS has to point out, that the langauge of the law itself, specifies "tap water". Water for irrigation, on a farming scale, does not go through water processing (conventionally), and is instead, usually pumped direct from rivers/canals, etc.

Regarding tap water... it could be argued that water for domestic chores, need not be held to the same standard as 'drinking water'... but then, there is always a risk that children may end up drinking water from anywhere in the house.... so, the AAS believes we MUST have equivalent safety standards on ALL domestic and 'tap' sources.

Date15:12:50, December 30, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Water Quality
MessageRegarding fire-fighting... the AAS needs to point out that, conventionally, fire-fighters 'tap' into conventional drinking water mains as a matter of course. It is unfortunate that water that is high enough quality to drink, is also being used to fight fires.... but the AAS sees no real alternative - unless we are willing to install an entire 'secondary water' network.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 301

no
  

Total Seats: 62

abstain
  

Total Seats: 137


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52