We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti torture bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers Commune
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2052
Description[?]:
| torture is evil |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of torture for obtaining information.
Old value:: Suspects can only be tortured under grave emergencies where the information is vital.
Current: It is at the discretion of the police officer to torture suspects for information.
Proposed: Torture is never allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:57:50, May 14, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Anti torture bill |
| Message | ...Didn't we vote against this not too long ago? |
| Date | 02:57:06, May 14, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Workers Commune | To | Debating the Anti torture bill |
| Message | yeah, but the number seats changed |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 273 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 261 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 107 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The free market is ugly and stupid, like going to the mall; the unfree market is just as ugly and just as stupid, except there is nothing in the mall, and if you don't go there, they shoot you." - P. J. O'Rourke |