Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:49:06
Server time: 20:10:53, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (8): ADM Drax | Archangel_1 | Brazil25 | Interstellar. | Maarten_saridan | Paulo Nogueira | R Drax | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fair Representative Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labor Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3664

Description[?]:

Vote.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:48:43, May 10, 2014 CET
From National People's Front (NPF)
ToDebating the Fair Representative Act
MessageCurrent value/article is fine.

Date16:56:22, May 10, 2014 CET
FromAloria National Party
ToDebating the Fair Representative Act
MessageWe need more explaination about this. Would be helpfull if we know too what reason behind this bill.

-Olinga Atangana-
Chief of ANP Public Relations division

Date05:55:40, May 11, 2014 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Fair Representative Act
MessageThe current system would not be changed as the populations of our states are nearly equal. However, it is the spirit that representation should be based on population and not that of the state.

Do you prefer the US Senate model, or the House of Representatives model?

Date08:02:30, May 11, 2014 CET
FromAloria National Party
ToDebating the Fair Representative Act
MessageAfter we recieve update from labor party, we decide to vote no. Because we pefer the House of Representative model.

Thank you.

-Olinga Atangana-
Chief of ANP Public Relations division

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 91

no
  

Total Seats: 177

abstain
   

Total Seats: 132


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55