We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Car Act of 2162.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2164
Description[?]:
This bill will remove the restrictions on the private ownership of cars. It is unrealistic to limit the number of cars that a family can own, as well as limiting the ecomonic oppurtunities for a person or family. The number of automobiles should not be limited by the government. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:04:10, December 29, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Private Car Act of 2162. |
Message | Great, so we already allow the purchase of vehicles that increase pollution and damage, but at least we try and limit that damage, but now we want to send the message to the people and, more importantly, to motor manufacturers that they can buy and produce in large quanitities massive petrol guzzling cars that have no benefits to them except that they are cheap. Brilliant... |
Date | 13:20:41, December 30, 2005 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Private Car Act of 2162. |
Message | We agree completely with WSS on this issue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 100 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 175 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 125 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "Don't listen to what the Communists say, but look at what they do." - Nguyen Van Thieu |