Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 00:10:24
Server time: 07:49:35, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Programme for Diplomatic and Military Restraint, 3675

Details

Submitted by[?]: União Democrática do Tukarali

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3675

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:25:08, June 03, 2014 CET
FromConservative People's Party
ToDebating the Programme for Diplomatic and Military Restraint, 3675
Message"If this bill passed, Tukarali would be totally undefended from any possible foreign thraet. The CPP believes that nuclear arms, as well as biological and chemical arms, are not something to be used to attack other coutries, but to defend from them."

Gilberto Souza, spokesman of Defence of the CPP

Date08:22:50, June 10, 2014 CET
FromUnião Democrática do Tukarali
ToDebating the Programme for Diplomatic and Military Restraint, 3675
Message"If the CPP belivers that nuclear, biological and chemical arms are defensive weapons, they are either naive or cynical."

Ean Magalhães, UDT/TDU spokesperson for Defence

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 40

no
   

Total Seats: 85

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63