Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 02:58:09
Server time: 13:01:50, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Kubrick2 | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Réduction des taxes, 3676

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alliance des Démocrates

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3676

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:26:05, June 05, 2014 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
MessageA 1% decrease on a 50% tax makes little difference to consumers. The current tax rate only discourages people from spending money, which in the end damages the economy and hurts government finances.

Date01:43:49, June 05, 2014 CET
From Parti Nationaliste 🌞
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
MessageThe current tax rate only discourages RICH people from spending money. The effect of decreasing luxury taxes has a very little negligible effect in terms of consumption and investments since the rich can afford to buy luxury items.

Date01:49:36, June 05, 2014 CET
From Parti Nationaliste 🌞
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
Message*RICH (sic: poor)

Date02:51:17, June 05, 2014 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
MessageApparently, only the rich are entitled to luxury items. Keep the masses where they are, is it? Flawed logic from the PN all around.

Date08:33:10, June 05, 2014 CET
From Parti Nationaliste 🌞
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
MessageYou did not get the point. The luxury taxes is not the reason that damages the economy since the rich can afford luxury items even though they are taxed heavily. The investments and consumption did not decrease because of luxury taxes but instead decrease because of lower income taxes for the masses.

Date12:24:54, June 05, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the Réduction des taxes, 3676
MessageBecause I think 1 % on items that are very expensive makes a great difference, we will vote against this bill! We are a social party, so I think we have to encourage the poor and not the rich people.

Louise Legrand
Mouvement Socialiste Rildanorien

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 84

no
 

Total Seats: 21

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

    Random quote: "I have no faith in political arithmetic." - Adam Smith

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54