Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 03:15:09
Server time: 04:44:50, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): MyungJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Changes in the Congress

Details

Submitted by[?]: Workers Revolutionary League - Gaduridos

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3678

Description[?]:

A Congress of 300 deputies, and a legislature of only 32 months (to avoid legislative lockdowns like 3673-3674)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:41:33, June 07, 2014 CET
FromWorkers Revolutionary League - Gaduridos
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageActually I think in Beluzia, they had a 5 years legislative deadlock because of inactive parties.

Date20:49:58, June 07, 2014 CET
FromLabor United
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageOOC: Remember to add articles to your bills!!

Furthermore, it's completely unrealistic to double the size of Congress from 250 to 500 just like that. Also, we can just solve any eventual deadlocks with early elections. I am NOT making articles for elections if they are held with just a couple of days in between. And besides, 27 months is kind of a wird number, don't you think?

Date20:55:28, June 07, 2014 CET
FromWorkers Revolutionary League - Gaduridos
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageChanged it. 300 seats and 32 months should be better.

Date21:02:39, June 07, 2014 CET
FromLabor United
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageWe could support increasing the amount of seats to 300, but we won't back up decreasing the term lengths. Sorry.

Date03:37:54, June 08, 2014 CET
FromProgressive Workers of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageOOC: I do not think the deadlock of 3673-3674 was caused by a long term length. Tell me how the two are connected.


Date03:38:29, June 08, 2014 CET
FromProgressive Workers of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageThe PWG will not support increasing the size of Congress. Quite the opposite, the PWG would like Congress to be reduced.

Date03:39:36, June 08, 2014 CET
FromProgressive Workers of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Changes in the Congress
MessageOOC: 32 months is also a weird number. 2.66667 years?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 250

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "Conservatives define themselves in terms of what they oppose." - George Will

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57