We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Shed Reforms II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative People's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3690
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term of civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:01:37, June 23, 2014 CET | From | National Hutori Workers Party | To | Debating the Shed Reforms II |
Message | Against 1. I think we could change current 2 but I disagree with what you proposed. |
Date | 07:19:52, June 23, 2014 CET | From | Socialist Army Party | To | Debating the Shed Reforms II |
Message | We disagree, article 1 makes our country open to any threat against us. Article 2 maintain our country readiness against any threat, with give our people option in national service (firefighter, paramedics, coast guard, auxillary police, and state energy company) or military service |
Date | 18:13:48, July 01, 2014 CET | From | National Hutori Workers Party | To | Debating the Shed Reforms II |
Message | I support our current value. |
Date | 01:47:41, July 02, 2014 CET | From | Conservative People's Party | To | Debating the Shed Reforms II |
Message | I believe this change is better as we can still promote the military and recruitment without discriminating against certain people. If adults MUST serve either in the military or in Civil Service, then I would be fine with that. But when those who cannot join the military for religious, social or political reasons are still forced into some sort of service, I believe they should be equally paid for their work. Are they not serving their country? Are their efforts not less than that of a military member? Are they not as patriotic because they will not kill for their country, even though an individual could dedicate their lives to Civil Service? I say NO. They are not less patriotic! They are serving their country just as a soldier would, and they should be paid the same wage. They should NEVER be forced to make the choice between abandoning their values and losing money. To conclude, I DO NOT support or current value, and any party who values a person's right to believe as they choose should not support it either. -Simeon Ferland Shed Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 315 | ||
no | Total Seats: 195 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 239 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "Communism needs democracy like the human body needs oxygen." - Leon Trotsky |