We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3692
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Llanymôr Protocol.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:43:35, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | The Speaker initiates debate for this bill. Adequate time will be given before the bill is placed on the voting query. Speaker Liam Rendell (U-Ultran) |
| Date | 04:51:59, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | Press Release Ministry of Foreign Affairs Building, Llanymôr, Sildar November, 3691 I'm here today to explain what exactly the Llanymôr Protocol is and does. The Protocol ensures religious freedom and tolerance throughout the world. It was drafted by me with cooperation from the Western Selucian Patriarchal Church and the National Yeudi Council. This treaty will ensure that a main fundamental right of all people, the right to worship, shall not be infringed. I hope that Aloria can lead the way in religious freedom so that we can continue our push to liberate the oppressed and free the imprisoned. Foreign Affairs Minister Vincent Blake |
| Date | 06:36:07, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | We oppose A3. |
| Date | 06:53:03, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, While those on the right, such as the Union Party and UCP, believe in fair taxation of corporations and individuals, we respect religious freedom and believe that they should not be taxed because they are not for-profit. In a broader sense, we on the right believe that non-profits should not be taxed. It's puzzling as to why Labor wants to tax a non-profit organization. How are they to pay taxes when they aren't selling a service or product? Does Labor wish to tax religion out of existence? It is clear by now that Labor is anti-religion and believes in a sickening form of greed. A greed that not only benefits Labor, but also intentionally harms another entity. We saw this with the Prostitution Act. By encouraging something that we ought to fight and eradicate, Labor has only seemed to expand the industry. If they are successful, then the government would gain tax revenue because it would then be a legitimate career. Now we have this. Labor wishes to destroy religion, but in doing so profits from it. I cannot describe the Labor Party, but if I could, they would be sick and repulsive. They are sadistic in that they wish to harm our own people. No wonder they are the smallest political party in our nation. I appeal to the logic of all parties in Congress. The Union Party was very benevolent during our time as the ruling party, and though we struck a conservative-leaning line, we discussed issues, made amends, but always kept one thing in mind: to never too far to the left or the right. I was grateful for the multi-partisanship atmosphere that led to a great amount of growth. Unfortunately, Labor has decided to break any silent agreements on working together and maintaining a centrist line due to the recent arrival of LFP, which are dragging this country off the brink of near-ruin. Labor, now seeing their wet dream come true, has abandoned Alorians and joined LFP. Who could expect a politician, no, a group of politicians, to work towards nationalizing the energy industry, legalizing prostitution and sex slavery, and oppressing religion? I'm distressed to say that no one could. Congresswoman Cathy Adeline (U-Kurmal) Union Party Leader |
| Date | 16:34:57, July 06, 2014 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | The UCP graciously accepts all articles. We vote yes. |
| Date | 18:11:03, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | This bill will fail. |
| Date | 18:34:35, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | OOC: I will propose this treaty for ratification over and over again until it passes. |
| Date | 21:07:22, July 06, 2014 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Llanymôr Protocol |
| Message | Be my guest kid. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 445 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 305 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan |