Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5473
Next month in: 03:33:25
Server time: 08:26:34, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | jebjab | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the protection of the environnement

Details

Submitted by[?]: Left Liberal Communist Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3702

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the protection of the environnement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:57:28, July 25, 2014 CET
FromLeft Liberal Communist Alliance
ToDebating the Ratification of the protection of the environnement
Messagethis is a treaty on te action we should take to protect the environnement. and we have kept it as flexible as possible, hoverer there is some articles we cannot do otherwise

Date16:00:25, July 25, 2014 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the protection of the environnement
MessageI dislike articles 5 and 17; but will vote yes due to the overwhelming desirability of the rest.

Date16:18:41, July 25, 2014 CET
FromLeft Liberal Communist Alliance
ToDebating the Ratification of the protection of the environnement
MessageI will justify article 17 right now, when you keep wild animals at home, you are depriving them from their natural reflex and making them dependant on the man, that is not good for the wild naimals, they will not longer be able to live on their own in the wilds, is better for them to be in the wild, then in a cage. they are not domestic animals, many domestics animals cannot live in the wild.

article 5, we are sorry to impose such a limitation, but all other choice are bad.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 250

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page.

    Random quote: "Society comprises two classes: those who have more food than appetite, and those who have more appetite than food." - Nicolas Chamfort

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44