Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 4458
Next month in: 02:30:15
Server time: 21:29:44, September 21, 2018 CET
Currently online (6): matix1992 | mouse2220 | Nasania | OKELEUK | Ryouta_12 | Ugandaviking | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Less Laws

Details

Submitted by[?]: CNT/AFL

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2165

Description[?]:

Striking rather pointless laws off the books and strengthening the right to free speech at the same time.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:12:55, January 02, 2006 CET
FromFree Gov
ToDebating the Less Laws
Messagehow are we supposed to protect the character of our citizens if you remove both the slander and the libel laws.

Date04:02:40, January 02, 2006 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Less Laws
MessageIt is not the place of the state to protect the character of its citizens.

Date04:03:34, January 02, 2006 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Less Laws
MessageOh, and remember, this law doesn't make it illegal for people to sue about falsehoods printed/said about them, it just doesn't explicitly allow it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 26

no
    

Total Seats: 59

abstain
  

Total Seats: 15


Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54