We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Edict of Humane Extradition, Take II
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2166
Description[?]:
As it would be baseless for the Republic to send away foreign nationals to states that are known human rights violators, the Christian Socialist Party proposes the following legislation. It would be hypocritical of Hobrazia to disallow such practices but allow for persona non grata to be deported to nation states that openly engage in these practices. WHEREAS it is the right of every individual to be treated in a just manner, all foreign nationals set for extradition to a foreign nation who either practices capital punishment, torture, or any inhumane retribution must be granted a Writ of Extradition Exemption by the judge overseeing his or her case. If the judge does not properly comply, the said individual may appeal to the Minister of Foreign Affairs or the Minister of Justice, both of whom are authorized to distribute Writs of Extradition Exemption. By inhumane retribution, this bill means a) capital punishment b) torture, or c) anything less humane than Hobrazia's current laws. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The terms of extradition.
Old value:: Extradition to nations with capital punishment is not allowed, unless there are assurances that the death penalty will not be imposed.
Current: Extradition to nations with capital punishment or with cruel or inhumane treatment of suspects and convicts is not allowed.
Proposed: Extradition to nations with capital punishment or with cruel or inhumane treatment of suspects and convicts is not allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:27:41, January 02, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Edict of Humane Extradition, Take II |
Message | Here I go again on my own, Goin' down the only road I've ever known, Like a drifter I was born to walk alone... |
Date | 21:33:26, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Edict of Humane Extradition, Take II |
Message | I agree this time around. "Damn the torpedos". |
Date | 22:55:56, January 03, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Edict of Humane Extradition, Take II |
Message | Nothing like some Whitesnake to rally the other parties behind this legislation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 250 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 55 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 95 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America." - Bill Clinton |