Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5470
Next month in: 00:03:47
Server time: 23:56:12, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dx6743 | Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nationalist Act (May 3740)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ultranationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3741

Description[?]:

This bill will set the agenda, even if rejected, will inform all potential constituents what this party is all about. Let us make one thing clear, rival politicians, with or without you, we will do what needs to be done, even if we must do it alone - Vladimir Reznikov.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:01:22, October 09, 2014 CET
From Radical Alliance
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

I will not even consider debating such a populistic and antidemocratic bill. I would just like to say that we will never even consider letting the Ultranationalist Party inside our folds. Extremism and populism is never a good idea.

Lucas Hentze
President
Party Leader
Radical Alliance

Date16:24:47, October 09, 2014 CET
From Ultranationalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

Although we respect and applaud the president for his honesty, we never anticipated he or his party's co-operation, nor did we ever intend upon entering government with his party. As we have previously stated, we will do what is necessary, even if we must do it alone.

Anatoly Tutnev
Chairman of the Ultranationalist Party

Date18:31:58, October 09, 2014 CET
From Ultranationalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

We are not surprised by this mysterious Charles Carmichael, who is he, where does he come from, he and his party are after all some of the main catalysts of the country's chaotic decision to create a federation. We implore he and his affiliates to speak up. We are and will remain bewildered as to how they were able to obtain any credibility on the back of such silence. All constituents must be informed.

Anatoly Tutnev
Chairman of the Ultranationalist Party

Date20:20:34, October 09, 2014 CET
From Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

It is the view of the Federalist Party that these totalitarian policies which include censorship, denial of aid to those in need and the blatant intrusion in to the lives of people is against the will of said people. It is therefore an affront to Republican and Democratic ideologies and as such we cannot support this bill.

Charles Carmichael
Party Leader
Federalist Party

Date21:48:44, October 09, 2014 CET
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

I am truly horrified by this bill, and frankly, by the fascist party the has proposed it. Never in my time as a servant of the people of Hutori have I seen such a bill that would be as detrimental to our society as this. The only accomplishment that this bill would have is the institution of a government that systematically robs the people of this nation of their freedom.

Therefore, I call everyone in the Congress - Conservative, Liberal, Capitalist or Socialist - to join together to protect the freedom and integrity of this nation. Together, we must bring these fascists to their knees and stand for liberty and Democracy.

Francois Neveu
General Secretary of the Democratic Socialist Party

Date16:55:51, October 10, 2014 CET
From Ultranationalist Party
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker

We are quite frankly tired of DSP politicians calling us fascists, when we are not fascists, when we are nationalists and proud nationalists at that. That said, at the moment fascist parties have more credibility than the DSP, who appear to go into power with anybody, willing to welcome them into the fold. They are clearly not a party of convictions, but clearly a party of political opportunism.

Date17:07:50, October 10, 2014 CET
From Radical Alliance
ToDebating the Nationalist Act (May 3740)
MessageMadam Speaker,

It is no secret that the DSP and RA are two different parties, but both of us wish to create a more free and equal society for everyone. So I ask; why not cooperate with the party you have most in common with? Should the DSP instead cooperate with you, FP or PP? That would not make any sense when we have a parliamentary majority together.

Lucas Hentze
President
Party Leader
Radical Alliance

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 535

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

    Random quote: "Any system that takes responsibility away from people, dehumanises them." - Author Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 103