We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Debate on Paramilitaries
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ultranationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3742
Description[?]:
As our party's popularity begins to grow, we are finding it harder and harder to police our ralleys. The protection offered by local authorities is minimal and inadequate at best, we would even go as far to say that some of them are politically biased. We would therefore like to employ a small unit of armed personnel to police future party events and protect the party leadership from any would be radical opposition supporters. Thank you. Ismael Khan Member of the Ultranationalist Party |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed but are heavily regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:54:56, October 09, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, Can the "Gentleman" please explain to me why his party is the only party that finds the local police inadequate in policing their rallies? I have yet to find a party that finds this to be an issue. Paramilitaries are nothing but extremist political combatants used to undermine the Democratic system. We CANNOT allow them to exist. |
Date | 22:37:21, October 09, 2014 CET | From | Ultranationalist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, The "Gentleman" will happily explain that our party is the only party that is grossly different from that of other mainstream parties, that you are all very similar but dressed up slightly differently. That is why in future elections, we urge the masses that they should get behind us in recognizing that we are marginally different from these corporate puppet politicians, in recognizing that we are the only party willing to make the necessary changes. Paramilitaries appear to be the ONLY way in which we can protect ourselves. Down with this CORPORATOCRACY. Ismael Khan Member of the Ultranationalist Party |
Date | 22:41:44, October 09, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, The gentleman might want to review my party's voting history. If they knew a word of what they were talking about, they would know we couldn't be farther from "Corporate" politicians. As a Marxist group, we despise capitalism and corporations. But we despise fascist and tyrants like the brutes from the UltraNationalist Party. They might as well change their name to the "Fascist Party". |
Date | 23:00:27, October 09, 2014 CET | From | Ultranationalist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, The official members of the Ultranationalist party all have clean criminal records, are not violent, are all well educated and are from being tyrants, brutes or fascists. We are nationalists and we are very proud nationalists. You may portray yourselves as a Marxist organization but where you see a democratic revolution, I see complacency. I see a hunger for power and that is reflected in the current coalition that your party is greatly apart of. The Radical Alliance are far from a MARXIST group, they are REPUBLICANS and it can be therefore said that said their ideology is entirely different from yours. Ismael Khan |
Date | 15:09:01, October 10, 2014 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, What the gentleman fails to see is that in a Democracy we must work together with people who think differently than us. That is the reason we work with the Radical Alliance and the Federalist Party. Also, the gentleman must not realise that exteme nationalism IS a major part of fascist ideology. As for the comment about them being brutes, may I remind the gentleman that activist of HIS party brutally murdered an activist of the Radical Alliance. Sounds VERY brutish to me. |
Date | 16:09:59, October 10, 2014 CET | From | Ultranationalist Party | To | Debating the Debate on Paramilitaries |
Message | Madam Speaker, Let us just say that no official members have so far been connected with this murder and it would be therefore be wrong to assume that our party had any involvement. We have widely condemned this act, both to colleagues and the party leadership. I therefore think the 'Gentleman' is confusing fact with fiction. Ismael Khan Member of the Ultranationalist Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 97 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 304 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 134 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "A leader has the vision and conviction that a dream can be achieved. He inspires the power and energy to get it done." - Ralph Nader |