We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic expansion bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Fascist Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2166
Description[?]:
| Absolom ben Adamah has directed the party to submit the following. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Proposed: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:31:41, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Economic expansion bill |
| Message | We see the PSS has decided to follow a less-than-ecologically-friendly avenue? The AAS opposes. |
| Date | 22:04:49, January 03, 2006 CET | From | JLP Liberation Militia | To | Debating the Economic expansion bill |
| Message | The JLP enthusiastically supports this measure. |
| Date | 11:43:20, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Economic expansion bill |
| Message | We have come to the realisation that economic progress and prosperity for all is an acheivable goal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 49 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 381 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 70 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |