Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:31:52
Server time: 17:28:07, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Agricultural Privatisation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Monarchist Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3747

Description[?]:

The state should leave agriculture to privately-run farms who know what they are doing. There is no reason for the Ministry of Agriculture to try to run huge swathes of our agricultural sector.

Mathis Weiman
Economic Affairs spokesman

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:02:55, October 21, 2014 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker.

We dont see how this proposal will privitize this area. It would more deprive the area of needed funding.

Raven Valentinn
JDP Deputy Leader

Date00:14:26, October 21, 2014 CET
FromConservative Monarchist Alliance
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageOOC: This would privatise in the sense of selling off state-owned farmland to private farmers/landowners.

Date05:22:54, October 21, 2014 CET
FromSocial Libermuns Party
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Is the CMA trying to starve our populace? We need to encourage farmers to grow food. Not make it some sort of idiotic Capitalist game to see who can charge more for their potato.

~

Mattie Hopkins
MInister of Finance

Date15:24:56, October 21, 2014 CET
FromMovement for Percyism
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would rather let the local governments set the funding on agriculture in order to gain a diverse agricultural system as not every region is the same.

Esther Vinouk
Agriculture spokesperson CDP

Date23:49:30, October 21, 2014 CET
FromConservative Monarchist Alliance
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We remain confident that handing over farmland to farmers who know what they are doing would increase our agricultural output, resulting in more food and lower food prices for Lodamese citizens.

Mathis Weiman
Economic Affairs spokesman

Date02:45:57, October 22, 2014 CET
FromSocial Libermuns Party
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

What's this talk about "handing over" farmland?! Even a communist knows that you need to get something in return for the things you give out. Are you sure you understand economics, Weiman?

~

Mattie Hopkins
MInister of Finance

Date03:58:56, October 22, 2014 CET
FromConservative Monarchist Alliance
ToDebating the Agricultural Privatisation Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

I apologise for the imprecision in my language. No, we are not proposing to hand over state-owned agricultural land free of charge. We will charge the full market price for it, and use the proceeds to invest in projects like building schools and hospitals.

Mathis Weiman
Economic Affairs spokesman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 40

no
      

Total Seats: 544

abstain
 

Total Seats: 15


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...[where] the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." - James Madison

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63