We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....?
Details
Submitted by[?]: Peoples Front of Malivia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2167
Description[?]:
| Public nudity should be illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches should be permitted. People shouldnīt risk being forced to see nude persons, if they donīt want to... And as such public intercourse shouldnīt be legal to, since people shouldnīt have to risk seeing that, if it offends them... People could just run around and have sex everywhere. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:18:31, January 03, 2006 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | how about ugly people, should we ban them so people don't have to see them. We are offended by many things we see every day but so not try to ban them, we accept others as they are and support them in their rights to live their life how they wish. |
| Date | 20:19:59, January 03, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Liberals | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | Agree with PP |
| Date | 20:53:19, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Peoples Front of Malivia | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | These articles ONLY tend to the matter of sexual intercourse in public and public nudity, not ugly people ect. As such, the PP cannot compare ugly people, as you put it, with sexual intercourse or naked people. The PFM suggestes these articles because we want to make sure, nobody have to get offended by seeing such things, if youīre religious, you do not want to see such a matter in the church. People shouldnīt have to risk such things, and it is not like people canīt be naked among other people, they can just go to nudist colonies beaches. They can even have intercourse there infront of others.... Just not everywhere, like in goverment buildings, churches ect... |
| Date | 03:55:25, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | The comparison is valid since the reason you give is that one can be offended by sex or nudity, one can be equally offended by ugliness or members of the PFM. We do not feel that banning something simply because some find it offensive. Local governments have the right to keep things in such a way that the majority of locals feel is right. Why should the votes of someone in Itaki determine what they wear or not in Washibar. |
| Date | 17:45:34, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Peoples Front of Malivia | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | Even though the PP apparently can get offended by the PFM, the PFM still believes that sexual intercourse and nudity donīt belong in for example the church, in resturants, the assembly ect. It's as simple as that! Even though the local goverments have something to say in this matter, we still feel that this is an area, where we need to count upon our UNITED part of Malivia, therefore the suggestion. |
| Date | 17:53:07, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Does sex and the display of if belong in the church, on the dancefloor, in the assembly ect....? |
| Message | We are not offended by the PFM, we mearly stated that one could be offended by them. This is not a cause to ban them however. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 72 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 379 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 48 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara) |