We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fair Cabinet Laws
Details
Submitted by[?]: National People's Front (NPF)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3753
Description[?]:
| To make a fair ruling so that the popular get represented in the Cabinet. WHY? In the Democratic Society the Prime Minister is given to the Largest Party, the Prime Minister chooses the Cabinet. So to be a Democratic Society we must allow the largest parties to launch a Cabinet Proposal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:25:25, November 03, 2014 CET | From | Royal Conservative Party | To | Debating the Fair Cabinet Laws |
| Message | No, the head of state for effective government must propose his own government. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 168 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 147 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 185 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated" - Mahatma Gandhi |