Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 00:05:40
Server time: 19:54:19, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): albaniansunited | bcwhitehead | HawkDun | Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Realism Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 3759

Description[?]:

Our military makes us too nationalistic. We should exert peace. Frankly, militaristic aggression is a hinderance on our economy. This restricts the rights of weapons we deem evil. If you support an aggressive military, decline this. If you do not, accept this.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:50:40, November 14, 2014 CET
FromConservative Realism Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageAlthough we are conservative, we are for a less aggressive military.

Date05:11:52, November 14, 2014 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageWe reject any attempt to reduce the effectiveness of the Hobrazian military in protecting its people.

Date13:23:25, November 14, 2014 CET
FromConservative Realism Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageAnd we reject using the military in an immoral fashion.

Date22:50:22, November 14, 2014 CET
FromEagle Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThe holy Order party does not want to give up our military advantage to foreign competitors

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 325

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

    Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70